Can-Am vs Polaris is the ultimate showdown for anyone seeking the best UTV (Utility Task Vehicle) or SxS (side-by-side) for off-road adventures. This guide is for off-road enthusiasts, buyers, and anyone comparing Can-Am and Polaris UTVs. Choosing the right UTV can impact your off-road experience, budget, and long-term satisfaction. A UTV (Utility Task Vehicle), also known as a side-by-side (SxS), is an off-road vehicle designed for both recreational and utility purposes. Throughout this article, the terms UTV and SxS are used interchangeably.
There are two brands that contend for supremacy in the sport UTV (aka side-by-side or SXS) market in the production UTV realm with massive horsepower and monstrous torque. These two UTV industry heavyweights are provided by Polaris and Can-Am. Can-Am is a subsidiary of BRP (Bombardier Recreational Products) and has a history dating back to 1971. The Can-Am Maverick X3 X rs and Polaris RZR XP Turbo Dynamix are the vehicles we’re referring to. Polaris was founded in 1954 and is known for its rugged, reliable off-road vehicles. This competition between the two machines isn’t just about having the strongest power; it’s also about having the best suspension, the most comfort riding experience, the best 4WD, the best handling and steering wheel, and other crucial characteristics. Whoever has the best high performance between the two vehicles ultimately wins. Fortunately at Rhino USA, we’ve tested UTV repeatedly over the years.
In the world of off-roading and higher speeds rough terrain performance, drivers don’t want to compromise. The days when the Yamaha Rhino topped the supercar segment are long gone. Nowadays, UTV enthusiasts have clear objectives when it comes to the Can Am and the Polaris RZR:
Comfort
High speeds
High performance
Reliability
Generally, Can-Am vehicles are known for their ruggedness, high performance, and popularity in off-road environments, while Polaris ATVs have a reputation for reliability and off-road capability. Polaris introduced the first SxS to the market in 1999, pioneering the UTV/SxS industry. Both Can-Am and Polaris offer strong dealership networks for parts and service.
Can any UTV meet their expectations? The truth is that you’ll need to compromise. The Can Am maverick and the Polaris rzr are the two machines that fit the bill the best with as little compromise as possible. They don’t choose between power and cost saving. They are capable of reaching high performance. So we’ll review which UTV SXS is the best bet for your high speed.
|
Feature |
Can-Am |
Polaris |
|---|---|---|
|
Power |
Superior raw horsepower, aggressive acceleration, high-horsepower Rotax engines. Ideal for dunes and high-speed thrills. |
Smooth power delivery, controllable torque, versatile for technical trails and utility. |
|
Price |
Typically commands a higher price due to advanced features and high performance. Higher resale value. |
Offers a wider range of pricing options, from entry-level to high-end. More accessible for budget-conscious buyers. |
|
Comfort |
Sporty, aggressive designs with strong ergonomics and rider comfort. |
Utilitarian yet stylish, built for comfort and versatility. Plush suspension and smooth ride. |
|
Reliability |
Known for durability and toughness, especially in harsh environments. |
Strong reputation for reliability, longevity, and ease of maintenance. Extensive dealer support. |
|
Best Use Case |
Recreational riding, fast trail runs, dune racing, thrill seekers. |
Mixed use: property chores, hunting, family trail rides, technical trails, and utility work. |
|
Dealer Network |
Robust dealer network for sales and service. |
One of the largest dealer networks in the industry. |
|
Accessories & Customization |
Extensive accessory catalog, strong aftermarket support. |
Extensive accessory catalog, strong aftermarket support. |
|
Resale Value |
Typically higher resale value, especially for popular models. |
Strong resale value, especially for popular models. |
Both Polaris RzR xp Turbo and Can Am Maverick X3 launched in the snowmobile industry, creating room for competition and exciting development. Both vehicles were late to join the UTV market. In 2008, Polaris, taking inspiration from the Yamaha Rhino, introduced the Ranger RZR. This RZR prioritized power and fun without sacrifice. The UTV action magazine welcomed the Ranger RZR with open arms, recognizing the all-around play revolution driven by the RZR platform.
When planning your purchase, it's important to consider your intended use—whether you plan to use your UTV for work, trail riding, hunting, or family fun, as different models are better suited for specific activities. Some riders lean toward Polaris for its value and versatility, while others lean toward Can-Am for its sporty performance and aggressive styling.
Two years later, Can Am entered the all terrain and UTV market with the Commander 2, a power car designed for high speed. Can-Am focuses on aggressive, sporty designs with a strong emphasis on ergonomics and rider comfort. Can-Am typically leans into high performance, advanced features, and sharp, aggressive styling that appeals to riders who want maximum power and a sportier feel. Polaris designs are utilitarian yet stylish, built to withstand harsh conditions while offering a comfortable ride. Polaris focuses on versatility, comfort, and value, offering a broad lineup that covers casual trail riding, serious work, and family fun with very user-friendly ergonomics. Since then, the development teams of Can Am and Polaris have been competing against each other, until the most recent releases where they both added turbo engines (the Can Am RS Turbo RR and the Polaris RZR Xp turbo). For the sake of this article, we will examine the Polaris RZR XP Turbo (including the RZR XP Turbo S and Polaris RZR Pro XP) and the Can-Am Maverick X3 X RS, two manufacturers of the most potent and quick utility vehicles.
Next, let's take a closer look at how these two brands compare in terms of specifications and features.

The engines between the Polaris RZR XP Turbo S / RZR Pro XP turbo and the Can Am Maverick X3 turbo RR are both liquid cooled and electronically fuel injected. The Polaris CVT feeds the 168 horsepower engine. For the Can Am Maverick, it’s a 172 horsepower engine.
Can-Am is generally known for superior raw power and aggressive acceleration, supporting a performance-first machine philosophy. Can-Am vehicles are known for their powerful Rotax engines that deliver impressive horsepower and torque, and are often preferred for high-horsepower Rotax engines and stability in dune racing scenarios. Can-Am often leads in raw horsepower and sport-tuned suspensions, appealing to performance riders and thrill seekers who crave a sporty feel during recreational riding and fast trail runs. For primarily recreational riding, fast trail runs, and sporty feel, many riders gravitate toward Can-Am, while for mixed use including chores, hunting, and family trail rides, Polaris is known for practical versatility and ease of use. Polaris vehicles emphasize smooth power delivery and controllable torque, which many riders appreciate on tight, technical trails.
The RZR turbo S model introduced a better steering wheel, reducing sloppy experiences. Additionally the RZR 25% power steering boost surpasses the Can Am.
Essentially, an aftermarket module sign could help you take full control of your spark time in tandem with the air/fuel ratio of your vehicle, if you want to maximize performance.
When it comes to jumps and suspensions, the Polaris rzr is ahead of the game with an enhanced stock suspension system. When the car is airborne, the computer on board automatically stiffens the fox podium shocks for adjustable suspension. On the other hand, the Maverick x3 default settings turn rough terrain into a rough shocks suspension.
As if suspension wasn’t the only problem, the default setting for shocks with the X3 X RS also brings the rear skid plate in contact with the ground. Low ground clearance is part of the design. Comparatively, the combo of adjustable suspension and 4-inch rear ground clearance for the RZR turbo keeps parts alive for a little longer! Hard landings are more comfortable with the RZR xp turbo s thanks to its excellent plush suspension system and plush seating, which reduces fatigue on long rides.
That being said, the suspension travel with the X3 X RS and the RZR Pro XP is similar, with approximately 2 feet of suspensive travel at each end for both cars. Can-Am provides a planted, aggressive feel and better high-speed stability, while Polaris is known for plush suspension and less fatigue on long rides. Nevertheless, they both fly well and can take plenty of abuse before the shocks start showing alarming signs.
On the point of suspension travel and obstacles, it’s worth mentioning that the X3 Turbo RR has an increased wheel travel, wheelbase and width, helping go over bumps more effectively. Comparatively, the Polaris bring lesser wheel travel, but its adjustable stock suspension acts as an alternative to wheel travel when it comes to getting over rough terrains. Recommendations for either car is to unload the machines at 6:30 AM and set tire pressure at 13 psi for uneven bumps and whoops.
Next, let's see how these UTVs handle tight trails and technical terrain.
Both the Can Am X3 Turbo RR and the Polaris Pro XP are comfortable handling tight and winding trails. Power wise, they are similar in handling. Sound wise, the Can Am is a lot quieter than the RZR Pro XP. If you’re riding side by side in the same place, the Polaris could fully mask the X3 Turbo RR.
For narrow trails, the size and maneuverability of the UTV is crucial, and Polaris's shorter wheelbase excels here. In tighter trails, the Pro XP shines through its shorter wheelbase, delivering greater control over cornering. Polaris also focuses on smooth rides, technical trail capability, and versatile utility, with features like Ride Command enhancing the experience.
Now, let's compare how these machines perform at high speeds.

Comparing top speed between the RZR and the Maverick X3 X highlights the limitation and performance for the cars. Both the RZR Pro XP and the Turbo RR reach their limit shy of 90. Both remain stable, but the longer wheelbase of X3 X RS turbo enhances the sense of stability. The RZR's shorter wheelbase gives it a twitchy feel at higher speeds, not suitable for less experienced drivers. The aggressive steering wheel ratio in the Polaris can also take away some of the fun of its power, despite its suspension travel and adjustable suspension response.
The low ground clearance on the Can Am Maverick X3 X RS turbo can make landing uncomfortable. But it enhances stability behind the steering wheel at high speed. Besides, the RS Turbo wheels at the rear being one foot closer than the Polaris make a huge difference.
Next, let's look at the comfort and ergonomics offered by each brand.
The Can Am Maverick X3 X Rs 2018 model comes with four-point adjustable seats harnesses, while the Polaris RzR XP Turbo has standard automotive-style seat belts. The Can AM Maverick X3 X brings a leaned-back driver’s seat for a more comfortable experience. Both vehicles offer cab features designed for comfort, such as insulation, climate control options, and available upgrades like heating and weather sealing to enhance ride comfort and protection.
Yet, the low seating position unfortunately has many blind spots. The driver’s head is too low for appropriate visibility. Additionally, the seat is in an awkward spot for the steering wheel. Yet, these can be remedied with aftermarket parts to adjust the seating position and comfort.
There’s a significant body roll with the Can Am too, which could only be managed by switching the sway bar.
The RzR xp turbo s has considerably less blind spots, offering better visibility. But the higher driver’s seat in the Polaris is uncomfortable when cornering. The Polaris rzr xp turbo uses smart suspension shocks to help with the body roll the RzR had in older model UTV. Worth noting, the RZR xp turbo s front wheels and rear wheels stick out past the bodywork, ideal for higher speeds.
When comparing comfort and ergonomics, it’s important for buyers to sit in each vehicle to test the cab layout, plush seating, and overall fit before making a decision.
The Maverick x3 x rs has standard 14-inch aluminum beadlock wheels, while the RzR turbo prefers alluvium wheels.
With a high volume plastic for LED headlights, skid plate, and taillights, the Can Am Maverick X3 X Turbo RR makes it harder to access parts under the body panels.
Now, let's examine how these UTVs perform when it comes to towing, hauling, and work capability.
When it comes to tackling tough jobs and demanding off road adventures, both Can-Am and Polaris have built machines that stand out for their workhorse capabilities. The Can-Am Defender Limited gives a slight edge in towing, boasting a maximum capacity of up to 2,500 lbs—perfect for hauling heavy equipment, rock crawling with gear, or taking on big projects around the property.
The Polaris Ranger XP 1000 matches that impressive towing figure, and its smooth power delivery makes it a favorite for tasks that require steady, reliable performance, like plowing snow or hauling loads across rough terrain.
Hauling is just as important as towing, and both the Can-Am Defender and Polaris Ranger XP 1000 deliver with spacious, heavy-duty cargo beds. The Can-Am Defender’s bed can handle over 1,000 lbs, making it ideal for everything from worksite materials to camping gear for family trail rides.
The Polaris Ranger XP 1000 offers a similar cargo capacity, and both brands put a strong emphasis on durability and reliability, ensuring their vehicles are ready for whatever the trail—or the job—throws at them.
For budget conscious riders, the Polaris Ranger XP 1000 often comes in at a lower price point than the Can-Am Defender Limited, making it an attractive option for those looking to get the most value for their money. However, the Can-Am Defender Limited stands out with advanced features like Ride Command, which includes group ride tracking and other innovative tech that can make both work and play more enjoyable and efficient.
Ultimately, the choice between Can-Am and Polaris comes down to your priorities. If you’re a thrill seeker who needs maximum power delivery and towing capacity, Can-Am wins with its robust Defender lineup. If ride comfort, smooth handling, and a plush ride are at the top of your list, Polaris wins with its Ranger series.
Both brands offer a wide range of models and price points, so whether you’re planning off roading adventures, family trail rides, or need a reliable machine for daily work, you’ll find the perfect side by side to fit your needs. With their reputation for quality, reliability, and advanced features, Can-Am and Polaris continue to set the standard for UTVs in the market.
Next, let's compare the pricing of these two brands.
Things often start to get uncomfortable when you begin talking about money. These amazingly engineered UTV’s have all the bells and whistles but certainly don’t carry a small price tag. Generally, Can-Am vehicles typically command a higher price due to their advanced features and high performance, often coming at a premium price. Polaris usually offers a very wide spread of price points, with accessible entry-level units as well as top-tier machines, giving budget-conscious riders more stepping stones.
Here’s a simple price comparison table:
|
Model/Brand |
Starting Price |
Top Model & Price |
|---|---|---|
|
Can-Am Maverick X3 DS Turbo |
$21,599 |
MAVERICK X3 MAX X RS TURBO RR WITH SMART-SHOX 72 ($35,399, 200-hp) |
|
Polaris RZR XP 1000 (base) |
$21,899 |
RZR Pro R 4 ($41,699) |
Polaris offers a wider range of pricing options, with competitive entry-level models and high-end rigs. Both brands have strong resale value, but Can-Am typically commands a higher price in the used market. Obviously, none of the models offered by Can Am or Polaris are considered “budget” by any means, but you certainly get what you are paying for.
Now, let's see how each brand stacks up in terms of technology and features.
The Polaris rzr xp turbo s brings a much user-friendlier touchscreen display, letting the driver select Live Valve shocks to display active compression damping, selected mode, G-force, pedal position, steering angle, brake status and diagnostics for high tech real-time control. Full ride command solution integrated within the interior design of the RZR; at this point you can diagnose issues and improve the ride in a few clicks. There’s also the option for a rear view camera and full GoPro on the RzR turbo, which can be part of the Ride Command feature.
Comparatively, the Maverick x3 has a standard with a rear view mirror, push-to-start engine, DPS three modes power steering and Eco mode. Power steering on the Maverick X3 Turbo is a little easier to handle than on the RzR. There’s no sign of the unique ride command system that drivers can enjoy in the Polaris. We can only hope for better tech in the future on the part of the Can Am RS turbo.
Next, discover how you can enhance your UTV experience with the right gear and accessories.

Whether you're tempted to push your UTV to the limits or you want to try out new rough terrains, we recommend investing in Rhino USA recovery gear and tie down to ensure you can still make the most of your can Am or Polaris! Unsure which kit is best suited for your adventure? We did share prev post tips in our blog so feel free too explore the best ideas!
We hope you enjoyed reading our comparison of the ultimate side-by-sides Can Am Maverick and Polaris RZR. Make sure to check out our Rhino USA store for the best UTV recovery gear and off-road accessories that are a must-have for any UTV enthusiast!
Are Can Am UTVs more reliable than Polaris UTVs?
Both Can Am and Polaris UTVs are known for their reliability, but there can be differences between specific models and features. Both brands offer strong dealership networks for parts and service, making it easy to access maintenance and support. Polaris, in particular, boasts one of the largest dealer networks in the industry, which enhances convenience for finding vehicles, parts, and after-sales service. Polaris also has a strong reputation for reliability and longevity, with their vehicles often praised for ease of maintenance and strong dealer support. It’s important to research and read reviews from other UTV owners to get an idea of the reliability of different models. Regular maintenance and proper use and storage can also impact the reliability of a UTV.
Purchasing from an authorized dealership provides expert guidance, access to a wide range of new and pre-owned vehicles, financing options, and reliable after-sales support for accessories and repairs.
Which brand has better aftermarket support, Can Am or Polaris?
Both Can Am and Polaris have a wide range of aftermarket parts and accessories available for their UTVs. The aftermarket parts selection for both brands is growing, providing numerous options for customization. However, the availability and variety of aftermarket support can vary depending on the specific model and brand. It’s important to research the availability of aftermarket support for the specific UTV you are considering to ensure that you can find the parts and accessories you need to customize and enhance your vehicle.